http://ccgi.hashpling.plus.com/blog/implementation_of_operator_plus/ Don't worry, I've hidden all the complexity behind a macro. Tue, 19 May 2009 10:43:05 +0100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 http://ccgi.hashpling.plus.com/blog/implementation_of_operator_plus/comment-page-1/#comment-1867 Andy Balaam Tue, 19 May 2009 10:43:05 +0000 http://ccgi.hashpling.plus.com/blog/?p=58#comment-1867 Or rather, miss the lack of an &. Or rather, miss the lack of an &.

]]> http://ccgi.hashpling.plus.com/blog/implementation_of_operator_plus/comment-page-1/#comment-1866 Andy Balaam Tue, 19 May 2009 10:42:49 +0000 http://ccgi.hashpling.plus.com/blog/?p=58#comment-1866 I must say I much prefer Take 3 over the original implementation, just for its clarity (to me). I could easily miss an & and be confused. I must say I much prefer Take 3 over the original implementation, just for its clarity (to me). I could easily miss an & and be confused.

]]>